EpsteinProject.org

Court records

024_20

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS           Document 24        Filed 12/16/16     Page 1 of 5




Denise D. Riley (# 160245)
Riley Law PLLC
2710 Del Prado Blvd. S., Unit 2-246,
Cape Coral, FL 33904
Phone: 303.907.0075
denise@rileylawpl.com

Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice)
HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303.831.7364
Fax:     303.832.2628
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com

                              Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell


                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA


In re: SUBPOENA TO BRADLEY J.
EDWARDS
                                                 NOTICE OF STATUS OF SUBPOENA
Underlying case:                                   DUCES TECUM AND RELATED
                                                 RULINGS IN UNDERLYING ACTION
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff

v.                                                    Case Number 0:16-mc-61262-JG

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant

No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.)

       Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files this notice of her position respecting

the Subpoena Duces Tecum to Bradly Edwards and a Related Ruling in the underlying Action,

and the Status of outstanding Requests for Production and the Motion to Quash, stating as

follows:
      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS           Document 24        Filed 12/16/16      Page 2 of 5




   1. The Court should be advised that in addition to the Subpoena Duces Tecum served on

      Bradly Edwards (“Mr. Edwards”) which is the subject of the pending Motion to Quash,

      Ms. Maxwell served a similar, although not identical, Subpoena Duces Tecum on one of

      Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre other attorneys, Paul Cassell (the “Cassell Subpoena”), Ex. A.

   2. Mr. Cassell, like Mr. Edwards, moved to quash. The District Court for the District of

      Utah transferred the Motion to Quash to the Southern District of New York where the

      underlying action is pending.


[…]

Open in the archive