EpsteinProject.org

Court records

024

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:19-cv-10479-ALC-DCF Document 24 Filed 04/14/20 Page 1 of 28



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


JULIETTE BRYANT,

                     Plaintiff,

         -against-
                                                          Case No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DCF)
DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D.
KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of
the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD
EPSTEIN,

                     Defendants.




          DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
                MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT




                                TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
                                      875 Third Avenue
                          New York, New York 10022 Tel: 212-704-6000
                                      Fax: 212-704-6288

                                    Attorneys for Defendants
        Case 1:19-cv-10479-ALC-DCF Document 24 Filed 04/14/20 Page 2 of 28


                                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                         Page



PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................ 2
          I.         Plaintiff Alleges Decedent Sexually Assaulted Her From 2002-2004,
                     When She Was An Adult ....................................................................................... 2
ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................. 4
          I.         Plaintiff’s Causes Of Action Expired In 2014 At The Latest ................................ 4
          II.        Plaintiff’s Attempts To Invoke Extraordinary Statute Of Limitations
                   

[…]

Open in the archive