Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF Document 24-1 Filed 11/08/19 Page 1 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE NO. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE
JANE DOE 17,
Plaintiff,
v.
DARREN K. INDYKE AND
RICHARD D. KAHN, AS JOINT
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF
THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
NINE EAST 71st STREET CORPORATION,
LAUREL, INC., FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY,
INC., NES, LLC, MAPLE, INC., LSJE, LLC,
HBRK ASSOCIATES, INC., NAUTILUS, INC.,
CYPRESS, INC. and JEGE, INC.
Defendants.
______________________________________/
MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY ON BEHALF OF JANE DOE 17
AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, herein files her Motion to Proceed Anonymously and Supporting
Memorandum of Law and in support thereof states:
I. PLAINTIFF IS PERMITTED TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY IN THIS
CIRCUIT.
This action involves Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual assault of Plaintiff (“Plaintiff”) in violation
of the New York Law and/or the Trafficking Victims Protection Act under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591
through 1595. Plaintiff submits this Memorandum of Law in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Leave to Proceed Anonymously. Allowing Plaintiff to proceed anonymously will protect her
highly sensitive personal information that will remain the focus of this litigation. There is no
prejudice to Defendants in allowing Plaintiff to proceed anonymously, nor is there any significant
public interest in the disclosure of the Plaintiff’s identity. In fact, the public interest in this case
Page 1 of 7
Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF Document 24-1 Filed 11/08/19 Page 2 of 13
weighs in favor of granting Plaintiff’s request to proceed anonymously for her protection.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) requires
[…]