Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2010 Page 1 of 12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WPD
M.J.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
SARAH KELLEN,
Defendant.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _/
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION OF DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN
TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR A HEARING TO PROVE FRAUD, TO PROVE PROPER SERVICE, TO
OBTAIN SANCTIONS FOR EPSTEIN'S SUBMISSION OF A FRAUDULENT
AFFIDAVIT, TO OBTAIN A WARNING FORBIDDING FURTHER OBSTRUCTIONS
IN THE CASES, AND TO SET AN ACCELERATED SCHEDULE FOR
DISCOVERY AND MOTION TO QUASH
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits the
following: 1) reply in support of Motion to Quash Service of Process (D.E.7) and Renewed Motion
to Quash (D.E.14); 2) response to Plaintiffs Motion for a Hearing to Prove Fraud, to Prove Proper
Service, to Obtain Sanctions for Epstein's Submission of a Fraudulent Affidavit, to Obtain a
Warning Forbidding Further Obstructions in the Cases, and to Set an Accelerated Schedule for
Discovery (D.E. 15); and 3) motion to strike impertinent portions of Plaintiffs response, and states
as follows:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs response to Mr. Epstein's motion and renewed motion to quash service of
process attempts to distort the key issue before the Court with misstatements, misleading
Case 9:10-cv-81111-WPD Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2010 Page 2 of 12
Case No. 9:10-cv-81111-WP
assertions, and scurrilous, unfounded and irrelevant allegations designed sole
[…]