EpsteinProject.org

Court records

013_23

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS            Document 13        Filed 07/07/16      Page 1 of 26




Jack Scarola
Florida Bar No.: 169440
Attorney E-Mail(s): jsx@searcylaw.com and
                    mep@searcylaw.com
Primary E-Mail: _scarolateam@searcylaw.com
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9451

                                 Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards


                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA



 In re: SUBPOENA TO BRADLEY J.
 EDWARDS                                            BRADLEY J. EDWARDS’S REPLY IN
                                                     SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH
 Underlying case:                                        SUBPOENA OR, IN THE
                                                    ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE
 VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff                                 ORDER

 v.                                                        Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JEM

 GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant

 No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.)




       Subpoena respondent Bradley J. Edwards, a non-party and attorney for the Plaintiff in the

Giuffre v. Maxwell action, hereby files this reply in support of his motion to quash.

       In her response to the motion, Maxwell withdraws several of her requests for production in

the wake of adverse rulings from Judge Sweet in the Southern District of New York. With regard

to the remainder, Edwards will clearly be unduly burdened, as a non-party, if he were required to
      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS            Document 13         Filed 07/07/16   Page 2 of 26




conduct burdensome searches for documents for no real purpose. With regard to the first two

requests, for example, relating to documents from the Dershowitz case, Maxwell now admits that

she already possesses some of the information that she seeks to

[…]

Open in the archive