EpsteinProject.org

Court records

013_16

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 29



                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                     CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 - MARRA/JOHNSON




  JANE DOE II,

                       Plaintiff,
  V.

  JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                       Defendant.
  --------------'/
                 DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S
                  COMPLAINT, AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW

        Defendant,    Jeffrey Epstein,   (hereinafter "Epstein"),   by and through          his

  undersigned attorneys, moves to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a cause

  of action, and for more definite statement.     Rule 12(b)(6), (e), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008);

  Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of dismissal, Defendant states:

        At the outset, Defendant gives notice to the Court that issues pertaining to 18

  U.S.C. §2255 in this motion to dismiss are also raised in the case of C.M.A. v. Jeffrey

  Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON, in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

  directed to Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Amended Complaint, Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Response, and

  Defendant's reply to C.M.A.'s response (which has yet to be filed).

         In this action, Plaintiff's Complaint attempts to allege a cause of action pursuant

  to 18 U.S.C. §2255 - Civil Remedies for Personal Injuries.            Significantly, Plaintiff

  previously a filed lawsuit on July 10, 2008, based on the same facts as alleged herein in

  the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida, Case No.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 2 of 29




 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
 Page 2

 50 2008CA020614 MBAF, Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein, and Sarah Kellen, (hereinafter

 "state action").        In attempting to allege a claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255, Plaintiff

 improperly 

[…]

Open in the archive