EpsteinProject.org

Court records

012_20

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

            Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB Document 12 Filed 12/23/19 Page 1 of 2



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------x
MARIA FARMER,

                       Plaintiff,
                                                                 ORDER
                  - against -
                                                         19 Civ. 10474 (NRB)
DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,

                       Defendants.
---------------------------------------x

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

           Non-party Alan Dershowitz ("Dershowitz") seeks permission to

file a motion for limited intervention in order to move to strike

the following allegation from plaintiff's complaint:                 "Among the

guests that came to the mansion, Maria observed Alan Dershowitz,

a lawyer, on a number of occasions, and observed that he would go

upstairs at the same time the young girls were there."                   ECF No.

1    <]I   39.   In the alternative,    Dershowitz requests that the Court

strike the allegation sua sponte.

           Having considered the several letters on this issue, see ECF

Nos. 9-11, the Court exercises its authority, pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12 ( f) ( 1) ,         to strike sua sponte the

aforementioned language.            See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (f) (1)    (" [O]n its

own," a court may "strike from a pleading an insufficient defense

or         any   redundant,     immaterial,    impertinent,     or   scandalous

matter.").         The Court briefly addresses its reasons for doing so.



                                          1
          Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB Document 12 Filed 12/23/19 Page 2 of 2



      First,     the    allegation      is        neither   material     nor   directly

pertinent to any claim or defense in this action.                        Nor does Rule

8   require     plaintiff     to    plead     credibility   

[…]

Open in the archive