EpsteinProject.org

Court records

012_18

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

       Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS            Document 12        Filed 07/07/16   Page 1 of 3




                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                 Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JEM

In re: SUBPOENA TO
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS

Underlying Case:

VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,

       Plaintiff

v.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

       Defendant

No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y)

______________________________/

          MOTION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO FILE AN OVER LENGTH
          REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA OR,
              IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

     COME NOW Bradley J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, to file this

motion for leave to file a reply not to exceed 25 pages in support of his Motion to Quash

Subpoena or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order in this action.

       As the Court is aware, on June 13, 2016, Bradley J. Edwards filed a twenty page motion

to quash a subpoena that had been served on him by Defendant Maxwell in connection with a

complicated case in the Southern District of New York, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433-

RWS (S.D.N.Y.). The motion was supported by seven exhibits. The Court opened the case as a

miscellaneous case.

                                                 1
       Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS            Document 12     Filed 07/07/16       Page 2 of 3




       On June 30, 2016, Defendant Maxwell filed a sixteen-page response to the Motion to

Quash. The response made allegations about whether Edwards had engaged in proper filings in

other court cases. The response also suggested that Edwards’s client, Ms. Giuffre, had withheld

discovery information that she was required to produce in the Southern District of New York.

The response was supported by 18 exhibits, including 5 exhibits that were under seal. The

exhibits total approximately 200 pages in length.

       Edwards has now drafted a reply to 

[…]

Open in the archive