EpsteinProject.org

Court records

011_8

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2009 Page 1 of 3




                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                              CASE NO.: 09-CV-80802-MARRA/JOHNSON

  JANE DOE NO. 8,

                 Plaintiff,
  vs.

  JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

              Defendant.
  ____________________________________/

                   PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 8'S UNOPPOSED MOTION
                     TO CONSOLIDATE FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES

         Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 8, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Unopposed Motion

  to Consolidate for Discovery Purposes, and states as follows:

         1.      This case involves the alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe No. 8 in 2001 by Jeffrey

  Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida.

         2.      The facts of this case arise from the same series of events as the multiple cases

  pending in this Court against Jeffrey Epstein which are consolidated for purposes of discovery as

  Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case no. 08-CV-80119-Marra/Johnson.

         3.      It is anticipated by the parties that there will be a significant overlap in witnesses,

  evidence, and depositions in this case and the consolidated proceedings.

         4.      Accordingly, Jane Doe No. 8 requests that this Court consolidate this case with Jane

  Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case no. 08-CV-80119-Marra/Johnson and consolidated cases, for

  purposes of discovery only and amend the caption of the consolidated cases accordingly.

         5.      Prior to the filing of this Motion, Plaintiff’s counsel conferred with Defendant’s




                                                  -1-
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2009 Page 2 of 3




  counsel, who advised that Defendant does not oppose the relief requested.

  Dated: August 11, 2009.                       Respectfully submitted,

                   

[…]

Open in the archive