Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CIV• 80469 - MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE II,
Plaintiff,
V.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_____________/
DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS & SUPPORTING
MEMORANDUM OF LAW DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves
to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loe. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D.
Fla.), in his memorandum of law in support of his motion to dismiss directed to Plaintiff
JANE DOE ll's Complaint [DE 1], filed March 25, 2009. In support of his motion,
Defendant states:
1. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that absent prior permission of the
court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding 20 pages in length.
Defendant is in the process of preparing his motion to dismiss and supporting
memorandum of law directed to Plaintiffs Complaint, (which is due by an extension to
May 6, 2009), and the legal memorandum will exceed the 20 page limitation. It is clear
based on the issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint that in excess of 20 pages is required
to fully and adequately discuss the issues raised in moving to dismiss Plaintiff's action.
2. The issues being addressed include but are not limited to constitutional law
issues and what version of 18 U.S.C.A. §2255 applies to this action, and the meaning of
§2255 with respect to the cause of action created and the presumptive minimum
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 2 of 3
Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
Page2
damages amo
[…]