EpsteinProject.org

Court records

011_10

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 3




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                          CASE NO.: 09-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON

  JANE DOE No. 101,

                    Plaintiff,
  V.

  JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                     Defendant,
  ______________,/

       DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
                OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

       Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned

  attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to

  Complaint dated, April 17, 2009. Defendant seeks an extension until May 26, 2009, to

  file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:

       1. On April 17, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]. Defendant's response would

  be due on May 11, 2009.

       2. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is

  named a Defendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been preparing responses to

  Motions for Protective Order and handling other matters associated therewith.

       3. Additionally, Defendant's counsel is in the midst of preparing for a state court

  trial, CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A

  v. LEWIS, M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 2 of 3




  Doe 101 v. Epstein
  Page2

  through 15, 2009). Discovery in that case is ongoing with several depositions set to

  prepare for trial.

     4. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will

  provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond.

      5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and

  Plaint

[…]

Open in the archive