EpsteinProject.org

Court records

010-17

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS   Document 10-17   Filed 06/30/16   Page 1 of 37




                     EXHIBIT Q
     Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS       Document 10-17       Filed 06/30/16      Page 2 of 37




                                         IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
                                         FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
                                         PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA


JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
                                         Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201
                                         CASE NO.

             Plaintiff,                          SO 2009CA01t 08 C\G'ftt/..MB
v.

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
                                                                     COPY
                                                              RECEIVED FOR FILING
    Defendants.
________________ _,/                                               DEC O7 i00a
                                                                      l?l'li'lf'll;iN I'\, ~QGK
                                       COMPLAINT                  Qblli"'t\' ceMl<l'fFlgbbil"I
                                                                  ~\f\@Y\'I' !'}\\/lb §11/l§l©N
       Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his

undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN,

individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually. Accordingly,

EPSTEIN states:

                                SUMMARY OF ACTION

              Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm

of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. for personal greed and enrichment, in betrayal

of the ethical, legal and fiduciary duties to their own clients and professional obligations

to the administration of justice, deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that

involved a staggering series of gravely seri

[…]

Open in the archive