Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS Document 10-10 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 17
EXHIBIT J
Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM DocumentDocument 10-10
326 Entered FiledDocket
on FLSD 06/30/16 Page 2 of
04/15/2015 17 1 of 16
Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-KAM
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2,
Petitioners,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
______________________________/
ORDER DENYING INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
This cause is before the Court on Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein’s Unopposed Motion for a
Supplemental Protective Order. (DE 261). The once-unopposed motion is now opposed by
Petitioners (DE 298) and prospective intervenors the Palm Beach Post and Palm Beach Daily
News (the Media) (DE 305).1 Considering the positions of the parties and intervenors, the Court
concludes that the proposed supplemental protective order should not issue.
I. Background
This is a case against the United States for allegedly violating the Crime Victims’ Rights
Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, by failing to involve Petitioners (and other similarly situated
victims of Intervenor Epstein) in the process that ultimately led to a federal non-prosecution
agreement between the Government and Epstein. (DE 1). The parties and intervenors have
debated, and continue to debate, the discoverability and discloseability of correspondence
documents that evidence just exactly what transpired between the Government, Epstein, and their
[…]