EpsteinProject.org

Court records

008_21

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS            Document 8        Filed 06/30/16     Page 1 of 19




Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (pro hac vice)
HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303.831.7364
Fax:     303.832.2628
jpagliuca@hmflaw.com

Denise D. Riley (# 160245)
Riley Law PLLC
2710 Del Prado Blvd. S., Unit 2-246,
Cape Coral, FL 33904
Phone: 303.907.0075
denise@rileylawpl.com

                               Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell


                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA


In re: SUBPOENA TO BRADLEY J.
EDWARDS
                                                 RESPONSE OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Underlying case:                                 TO BRADLEY J. EDWARDS’ MOTION
                                                  TO QUASH SUBPOENA, OR IN THE
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff                   ALTERINATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE
                                                             ORDER
v.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant                         Case Number 0:16-mc-61262-JEM

No. 15-cv-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y.)


       Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s files this response to non-party Bradley J. Edwards

Motion to Quash Subpoena or, in the alternative, for a protective Order, and states as follows:

               BACKGROUND FACTS RELEVANT TO THE SUBPOENA

       The Southern District of New York case in which the Subpoena was issued arises directly

from a pleading filed in a case by non-party Bradley Edwards (“Edwards”) and his co-counsel
       Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS               Document 8        Filed 06/30/16        Page 2 of 19




Paul Cassell (“Cassell”) on behalf of the Plaintiff, Virginia Giuffre (“Plaintiff” or Ms. Giuffre”).

As explained by Edwards, he and Cassell represented the Plaintiff in this action in a separate

case pending in the Southern District of Florida, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States,

No9:08-cv-80736-MARRA (S.D. Fl.) (the “CVRA” 

[…]

Open in the archive