Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2008 Page 1 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE, a/k/a
JANE DOE #1,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON,
and SARAH KELLEN,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S
OPPOSED MOTION TO ALIGN RESPONSE DATE
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(A), to align
the deadline for filing his response to the complaint with the deadlines set in Jane
Doe Nos. 2 through 5 of September 4, 2008, and as grounds for this relief,
respectfully states as follows:
1. This matter was removed to Federal Court on July 21, 2008. (DE 1).
2. On July 25, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion to stay this action. (DE
4 & 5).
3. That same day, Mr. Epstein moved for an enlargement of time to
answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after the motion for
stay was decided. (DE 3).
3059 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 340, COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133
Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2008 Page 2 of 5
4. On August 6, 2008, this Court denied the motion for stay. (DE 7).
5. This Court has not yet ruled upon Mr. Epstein’s motion for an
enlargement of time.
6. In a series of substantially identical lawsuits brought against Mr.
Epstein, however, this Court - - upon the denial of motions for stay filed in those
cases - - granted Mr. Epstein an additional ten days to respond to the complaints
nunc pro tunc. Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80119-KAM (S.D. Fla.)
(DE 33); Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80232-KAM (S.D. Fla.) (DE 29);
Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, No. 08-CV-80380-KAM (S.D. Fla.) (DE 39); and Ja
[…]