EpsteinProject.org

Court records

007_16

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 Page 1 of 3


                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                      CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 - MARRAIJOHNSON




 JANE DOE II,

                         Plaintiff,
 V.

 JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                       Defendant.
 -------------'
            DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE
                         A RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

         Defendant,   Jeffrey Epstein,    (hereinafter "Epstein")    by and through      his

 undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to

 file his Response to Plaintiffs Complaint.

      1. On March 25, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1] in the within matter. Plaintiff

 and Defendant counsel agreed Defendant would file a response by May 1, 2008.

 Defendant is requesting a five day extension to May 6, 2009 to respond.

      2. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is

 named a Defendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been handling other matters

 associated therewith.

      3. Additionally, Defendant's counsel is in the midst of preparing for a state court

 trial, CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A

 v. LEWIS, M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2009 Page 2 of 3



 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
 Page2

 through 15, 2009). Discovery in that case is ongoing with several depositions set to

 prepare for trial.

     4. An extension until May 6, 2009, is fair and reasonable under the circumstances.

 The undersigned is in need of the additional time in order to fully and adequately

 prepare a response on behalf of EPSTEIN.

     5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff's counsel

 counsel by telephone, and Plaintiff's c

[…]

Open in the archive