EpsteinProject.org

Court records

004_28

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:25-mc-80920-RLR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/23/2025 Page 1 of 12




                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                        FILED BY ,,.,/4 C              o.c.
                                SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                                                                                             //
    IN RE: Grand Jury 05-02                                                                  JUL 23 2025
    (WPB) & 07-103 (WPB)                                                                    ANGELA E. NOBLE
                                                                                           CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT.
   ----        - - - - - -I                                                                S.D. OF FLA. - W.P.B.

         ORDER DENYING PETITION TO UNSEAL GRAND JURY TRANSCRIPTS

          The matter before the Court is the United States ' request to unseal grand jury transcripts

   stemming from the Government's investigation into Mr. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District

   of Florida. For the reasons set forth below, Eleventh Circuit law does not permit this Court to grant

   the Government's request; the Court's hands are tied-a point that the Government concedes.

           The Government initiated the matter before the Court by filing the United States' Petition

   to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts on July 18, 2025 , and the Government's Response to the Court's

   Order on Supplemental Briefing (hereinafter "Supp. Br.") on July 20, 2025 (together, the

   " Petition"). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6, the Government requests that the

   transcripts related to grand jury investigations 05-02 (WPB) and 07-103 (WPB) (the "Florida

   Federal Grand Jury Proceedings") be unsealed "subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related

   and other personal identifying information." Pet. at I. Additionally, the Government states that

   "[t]o the extent this Court ma

[…]

Open in the archive