Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 09-80802-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE NO. 8,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel is
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), a copy of this order.
It is further ORDERED:
1. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 26.1 and
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is
excluded under Rule 26(a)(B), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last
responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is
earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a
prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by
Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties’ views and
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2009 Page 2 of 2
proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference
outlining the proposed discover
[…]