DOJ evidence release
- Format
- Set
- DOJ Data Set 8
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 100%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
From: To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Memorandum & Opinion Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:29:50 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2022.04.29_Opinion_and_Order.pdf Attached is Judge Nathan's order on the last round of post-trial motions. I'm happy to report that this now means that all post-trial motions are resolved, and we are proceeding to sentencing as scheduled. Have a great weekend— From: Sent: Friday, April 29, 2022 4:54 PM To: Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Memorandum & Opinion This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e- mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS••• There is no charge for viewing opinions. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 4/29/2022 at 4:54 PM EDT and filed on 4/29/2022 Case Name: USA v. Maxwell Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Filer: Document Number:657 Docket Text: OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell....[*** See this Opinion & Order ***]... V. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the Defendant's Rule 29 motion because the jury's guilty verdicts were supported by the witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at trial. The Court denies the Defendant's motion based on constructive amendment or EFTA00038962 variance because the jury instructions, the Government's evidence at trial, and summation all captured the core of criminality charged in the Indictment, and the Defendant was not prejudiced by any alleged variance. Further, because the Government neither intentionally delayed its prosecution nor was the Defendant prejudiced by any delay, the Court also denies the Defendant's motion based on pre-indictment delay. Finally, the Court grants the Defendant's motion as to multiplicity. The Government concedes that Count One is […]